eng
About   |   Newsletter
Demand & Supply Chain Management Evolution




14 Dec 2018
The Benefits of Inbound Pull in Modern Logistics

Brian Hoey
flexis

The Benefits of Inbound Pull in Modern Logistics Let’s pretend that you and a friend are both mixologists at an upscale cocktail lounge. On weekends, there tends to be a rush of patrons late in the evening who ask for drinks faster than you can produce them. As a supply chain or logistics manager in real life, in this scenario you might be tempted to suggest that you and your fellow bartender start creating a buffer stock of drinks before the big rush, so that people can receive their drinks as soon as they order them. Unfortunately, you can’t really know what drinks people will order in advance (to say nothing of the fact that the ice will melt), so creating a buffer stock is impractical. You can, however, do some prep in advance, like preparing garnishes and simple syrup. When the rush comes, you’re still slammed, but you’re able to create drinks more efficiently.

 

This example should illustrate two things: one, that bartending is hard work; and two, that finding the balance between push and pull strategies can be complicated, delicate work. No business can perfectly calculate all demand in advance and simply prepare their goods on a set schedule ahead of time, just as no business can wait until the customer is standing at the cash register to put a supply chain strategy into place. For many supply chains, a primarily push-based strategy remains the norm, but what would happen if those in the industry thought a little more like our pair of mixologists?

 

Push vs. Pull

Okay, let’s back up for a second. In the paragraph above, we alluded to push and pull models for supply chain and logistics strategy, subtly suggesting that an increased emphasis on pull models could become a value driver for businesses that adopt them. But before we get into why that my be the case, we’re going to offer a quick refresher on the difference between push and pull. In push-based models, businesses don’t wait for real demand to materialize before they source, manufacture, distribute, or ship their products. Instead, they estimate demand and plan (at any level of the supply chain) to meet that demand by “pushing” their products through the value stream toward the consumers. In pull systems, the opposite is true. Businesses wait, to the extent that they’re able, for real demand to materialize before letting their goods be “pulled” upstream. This concept is closely associated with popular ideas like just-in-time deliveries and lean supply chain planning. Pull models often make more sense for businesses that offer a high degree of customization (like our bartenders above, for instance), but in point of fact almost all businesses utilize a combination of the two, pushing their products through a certain number of touchpoints on the value chain and letting them be pulled the rest of the way.

 

The Benefits of Inbound Pull

Now, the all important question: so what? If all businesses utilize some of both system, why should you consider it a priority to shift towards one or the other? Simply put, an increased emphasis on pull-based planning can help to reduce the need for large buffer stock and create more efficient, synergistic production and transport workflows. How? By giving disparate points on the value chain enough visibility and insight into one another’s operations to maintain planning flexibility. Let’s say, for instance, that your industry’s real demand levels are fairly predictable year over year, and a push-based production workflow makes the most sense. You could still implement pull-based strategies at the logistics level. Instead of scheduling transports in advance and adhering to rigid timetables for moving parts or finished goods, you could wait to transport your stock from one manufacturing facility to another until necessary parts from a third facility are ready to be shipped, so that the final product can be assembled without a long, unnecessary lead time spent waiting for all of the parts to arrive.

 

In this way, you might be able to avoid less-then-full truckloads and costly inventory usage. By the same token, you could leverage these pull-based principals in order to choose the optimal shipping times based on factors like price fluctuations and the availability of direct routes. In this scenario, you essentially capitalize on changing circumstances simply by reducing the rigidity of your transport logistics plans. Instead of determining a plan and hoping the market plays along, you let the market guide your planning, allowing subtle signals from within and without your own supply stream operations to present a fluid path for more responsive, synergistic operations.   

 

Getting in Sync

If we think back to our two mixologists, we can see how the idea of inbound pull in modern logistics represents a delicate balancing act. Real demand levels from the patrons determines the actions of each bartender, but they’re still able to be proactive rather than reactive. They might divide up different tasks between the two of them, timing things carefully in order to ensure that ingredients are ready at the precise moment they’re needed. There is added value here in the form of smooth, efficient production and distribution (of drinks), but there are also a number of challenges. Without effective channels of communication open, for instance, plans can quickly fall apart due to poor coordination. By the same logic, data or decision-making silos can make it difficult or impossible to synchronize your plans with real demand levels and with the existing needs of your production and logistics plans.

 

This, essentially, represents the challenge that businesses need to overcome in order to transition to an inbound pull model. Outdated information, poor communication, and over-reliance on demand forecasts effectively force businesses to rely on a push model even when waiting for the “pull” would present more opportunities to bolster efficiency. For businesses that can overcome these hurdles, inbound pull represents a potentially significant value added proposition.

Download your Industry 4.0 Guide

 

 

 

 

 









 
           Circular Economy     Industry 4.0     Blockchain 

     Internet of Things     Omni Channel 


Join us on


News & Trends
 

Last update 2 Aug 2019
PMI falls to lowest since September 2009
   Source: Markit US Manufacturing PMI   -  IHS Markit
United States 


Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals

Maximum safety and reliability and reducing the costs for our customers at the same time: we are able to offer the chemical industry an extensive range of chemical logistics services that hardly any other logistics specialist can match. It is our goal to harmonise our services with your specifications in s...


Deloitte Study: More than 70 Percent of Consumers Plan to Shop During the Holiday Weekend; Cyber Monday to Grab the Most Spending

More than 7 in 10 (71 percent) holiday shoppers plan to head to the stores and online over the Thanksgiving weekend (Thanksgiving Thursday - Cyber Monday), according to a new survey from Deloitte. Holiday shoppers say...


Education
 

Local & Regional Agenda
 


Resources
 
MADEL: Roadmap to Industry 4.0: Planning & Scheduling in the personal & home care industry

Established in 1977 Madel Spa, is a leading Italian manufacturing company specialized in products for home & personal care. Madel’s mission is the capability to create high-quality and environmentally sustai...

ProcureCon Indirect 2015 Benchmarking Study

In anticipation of the 2015 ProcureCon Indirect 2015 conference, the organization released the results of this year’s benchmarking study. Take a look to see how your peers answered such questions as:- Which five in...


International Agenda